CIPP/E Study Guide
IAPP Training · Module 2 - BoK II.A

Module 2 · Special categories of personal data (Article 9)

Article 9(1) prohibits processing of special-category data unless an exception applies. The categories cover racial/ethnic origin, political opinions, religious/philosophical beliefs, trade-union membership, genetic data, biometric data (for unique identification), health, sex life and sexual orientation. Case C-184/20 extends Article 9 to data liable indirectly to reveal sensitive information. Article 10 governs criminal-conviction data. Special-category status can be subjective/contextual.

  • Racial or ethnic origin
  • Political opinions
  • Religious or philosophical beliefs
  • Trade-union membership
  • genetic data
  • biometric data processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying a person
  • Data concerning health
  • Sex life or sexual orientation

Article 9(1) makes processing of these categories prohibited unless an exception applies. Case C-184/20 (CJEU) held that processing any personal data liable indirectly to reveal sensitive information is subject to the Article 9(1) prohibition - significantly expanding Article 9's scope (special category by inference).

Article 10 covers data on criminal convictions and offences: it may be processed only under the control of official authority or when authorised by Union/Member State law with appropriate safeguards; comprehensive criminal registers only under official authority.

Context matters

Special-category status can be subjective and non-obvious: an X-ray of a broken arm is health data, but a holiday photo of someone with an arm in a cast may NOT be health data - it does not necessarily concern their health.

Key terms - quick answers

What is “Article 9(1)”?
Prohibits processing of special categories of personal data unless an exception applies.
What is “genetic data”?
A special category under Article 9 relating to inherited or acquired genetic characteristics.
What is “biometric data”?
Special-category data only when processed for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person.
What is “Case C-184/20”?
CJEU decision: data liable indirectly to reveal sensitive information falls under the Article 9(1) prohibition (special category by inference).