CIPP/E Study Guide
Ch 13.5.4–13.5.7 - Consistency & EDPB

Cooperation, consistency and the EDPB (Articles 60–66, 68–71)

Cross-border cases run through the cooperation procedure (Article 60): the lead authority circulates a draft decision; other concerned DPAs may agree or raise a reasoned objection. Mutual assistance (Article 61) and joint operations (Article 62) support this. The consistency mechanism (Article 63) sits the EDPB (Article 68) at its centre. The EDPB issues opinions (Article 64) and binding dispute-resolution decisions (Article 65); the urgency procedure (Article 66) allows provisional measures lasting up to three months. The WhatsApp case showed the EDPB forcing Ireland's DPC to raise a fine to €225 million.

EDPB and consistency tools
ArticleToolWhat it does
60Cooperation procedureLead authority circulates a draft decision; reasoned objections are accepted (→ revised draft) or rejected (→ consistency mechanism)
61Mutual assistanceCooperation and information exchange without undue delay, subject to a one-month long-stop
62Joint operationsAll concerned DPAs have a right to participate in joint investigations/enforcement
63Consistency mechanismOverarching duty to cooperate to apply the GDPR consistently
64EDPB opinionsOn DPIA lists, codes, accreditation criteria, contractual clauses, BCRs, and general-application matters
65EDPB binding decisionDispute resolution - binding decisions on rejected objections, competence disputes, or failure to seek/follow an Art 64 opinion
66Urgency procedureProvisional measures for up to three months, bypassing cooperation/consistency

The EDPB (Art 68) is the successor to the Article 29 Working Party (WP29). It comprises a chairperson, the heads of the DPAs and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS); the Commission may send a delegate. It must act independently (Art 69) and has a long list of tasks (Art 70), including publishing advice, guidance and best practice, plus annual reports (Art 71).

WhatsApp: the EDPB overriding a lead authority

In July 2021 an EDPB binding decision under Article 65(1)(a) required Ireland's DPC to impose a higher fine on WhatsApp than the €30m–€50m intimated - resulting in an uplifted fine of €225 million in August 2021. This showed DPAs successfully overturning the lead authority's jurisdictional primacy.

Key terms - quick answers

What is “Cooperation procedure”?
Article 60 - the lead authority shares a draft decision with concerned DPAs, who may agree or raise a reasoned objection; unresolved objections escalate to the EDPB.
What is “Reasoned objection”?
A concerned DPA's objection to a draft decision (e.g. on the finding or the size of a fine) under Article 60(4).
What is “Consistency mechanism”?
Article 63 - the system ensuring the GDPR is applied consistently, run through the EDPB.
What is “EDPB”?
European Data Protection Board (Art 68) - successor to the WP29; comprises a chair, the heads of the DPAs and the EDPS, with a Commission delegate attending.